This is the recommended procedure to manually design a secure FireHOL firewall. It applies to FireHOL 2.x versions, which understand both IPv4 and IPv6.
Note: this tutorial currently focusses on IPv4. It needs updating to include interface6 and how to merge the results. Meantime, please follow this guide, then read the upgrade pages which will explain how to introduce IPv6 to your firewall.
Network interfaces are there for some reason. You have to do something about all the interfaces of your host. If you don’t do something at the firewall level with a network interface, then it depends of the firewall policy what will happen with traffic on this interface. By default FireHOL will drop
all traffic coming in and going out via an undefined network interface, so the network interface will have no meaning to be up and running. This is a common mistake on some ADSL configurations, where users ignore the loop device that connects the Linux router with the ADSL device. To identify your network interfaces use the ip link show
command. The example below shows my home router ip link show
output:
[root@gateway /]# ip link show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:50:fc:21:9a:ab brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
12: ppp0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 3
link/ppp
There are a few important thinks to always remember:
lo
exists on all machines and is used for communication between programs running on this machine. FireHOL handles this automatically. You don’t have to do anything about lo
.lo
interface) are used for two purposes:
In the above example, it is clear that I have two network interfaces (except lo
): eth0
and ppp0
.
One extra step is to identify if the network interfaces appearing here might dynamically change during run-time. For example my ppp0
might become ppp1
or ppp2
in certain cases. To overcome this problem, I can say that my link to the outside world is not ppp0
but ppp+
. The plus character matches all the interfaces that begin with the text given before the plus sign. In this case, it matches all the possible network interfaces that start with ppp
.
Keep in mind that FireHOL (and iptables) does not really care if the interface defined in a firewall actually exists or not. This means that you can setup firewalls on interfaces that might become available later or altered during run time. This also means that if you define an interface with a wrong name, FireHOL and iptables will not complain.
Now I have to assign a role to each network interface, i.e. what is the function of each of those interfaces? For this, I create a table similar to the one below. It is important to focus on the requests; forget the replies.
interface | description | incoming requests | outgoing requests | routing requests in | routing requests out |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eth0 |
My home LAN | Many services from my LAN workstations (i.e. dns, ftp, samba, squid, dhcp, http, ssh, icmp) | A few services my LAN workstations provide (i.e. samba, icmp) | All LAN workstations requests going to the internet | Nothing |
ppp+ |
The Internet | I run a public mailer, a public web server and a public ftp server for my domain | All the services my Linux could ask from the internet | Nothing | All LAN workstations requests going to the internet |
Keep in mind that:
So, the above could also be presented as:
interface | name | servers provided | clients used | routing clients | routing servers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eth0 |
home | dns, ftp, samba, squid, dhcp, http, ssh, icmp | samba, icmp | all | none |
ppp+ |
internet | smtp, http, ftp | all | none | all |
This table can easily be transformed into FireHOL rules.
Now that you have a list of all the interfaces and their roles, it is time to start writing the FireHOL configuration file. First write one interface statement for each network interface you identified above:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
interface4 ppp+ internet
Now, we can add the servers for each interface (based on the table above). Remember that these servers are all running on the firewall host:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
server dns accept
server ftp accept
server samba accept
server squid accept
server dhcp accept
server http accept
server ssh accept
server icmp accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
server smtp accept
server http accept
server ftp accept
Now, we can add the clients for each interface. Remember that these clients are all running on the firewall host:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
server dns accept
server ftp accept
server samba accept
server squid accept
server dhcp accept
server http accept
server ssh accept
server icmp accept
client samba accept
client icmp accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
server smtp accept
server http accept
server ftp accept
client all accept
At this point, everyone should be able to inter-operate correctly with the firewall host, but still we don’t route any traffic. This means that the Linux box can “see” all the workstations on the LAN and these workstations can “see” the Linux box, also that the Linux box can “see” the Internet and the Internet can “see” the servers of the ppp+
interface of the Linux box, but the LAN workstations cannot “see” the Internet.
It is now time to setup routing. To do this we will have to define a set of routers for all the interface combinations. This means that if we have two interfaces we will have to define two routers. If we have 3 interfaces, we will have to define 6 routers, and so on.
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
server dns accept
server ftp accept
server samba accept
server squid accept
server dhcp accept
server http accept
server ssh accept
server icmp accept
client samba accept
client icmp accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
server smtp accept
server http accept
server ftp accept
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0
Remember that inface and outface match the requests, not the replies. This means that the router home2internet matches all requests originated from eth0
and going out to ppp+
(and of course their relative replies in the opposite direction), while the router internet2home matches all the requests from the Internet to the home LAN (and their relative replies back).
Now, based on the roles table of the previous section we see that we should route all requests coming in from eth0
and going out to ppp+
, and not route any request coming from the Internet and going out to the home LAN. Here it is:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
server dns accept
server ftp accept
server samba accept
server squid accept
server dhcp accept
server http accept
server ssh accept
server icmp accept
client samba accept
client icmp accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
server smtp accept
server http accept
server ftp accept
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
route all accept
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0
This is it. We are done! (for the filtering part of the firewall. Look below for setting up NAT too.)
To save typing time, you can use this:
version 6
interface4 eth0 home
server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp" accept
client "samba icmp" accept
interface4 ppp+ internet
server "smtp http ftp" accept
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
route all accept
Note that we can remove any router statements not having any rules in them, so the internet2home router has been eliminated.
We might want to have extra checks on each interface to prevent spoofing. To find the IPs of your network interfaces use ip addr show
and to find the IP networks behind each interface use ip route show
.
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp" accept
client "samba icmp" accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
server "smtp http ftp" accept
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
route all accept
UNROUTABLE IPS is a variable defined by FireHOL and contains all the IPs that should not be routed on the internet.
If home LAN did not have real IP addresses, we would have to add a masquerade command in our router:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp" accept
client "samba icmp" accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
server "smtp http ftp" accept
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
masquerade
route all accept
The masquerade command sets itself up on the outface of a router.
We can now protect our ppp interface even further. For this we use the protection command:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp" accept
client "samba icmp" accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
protection strong 10/sec 10
server "smtp http ftp" accept
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
masquerade
route all accept
It could be nice if instead of dropping wrong packets originated from the Ethernet, to reject them so that our workstations will not have to timeout if we do something that is not allowed. To do this we use the policy command:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
policy reject
server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp" accept
client "samba icmp" accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
protection strong 10/sec 10
server "smtp http ftp" accept
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
masquerade
route all accept
Some servers on the Internet try to ident back the client to find information about the user requesting the service. With our current firewall, such servers will have to timeout before accepting our request. To speed thinks up we could write:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
policy reject
server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp" accept
client "samba icmp" accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
protection strong 10/sec 10
server "smtp http ftp" accept
server ident reject with tcp-reset
client all accept
router4 home2internet inface eth0 outface ppp+
masquerade
route all accept
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0
route ident reject with tcp-reset
Note that we now have added the router we eliminated above, since we need to add a service to it.
The whole routing schema could be rewritten as:
version 6
# The network of our eth0 LAN.
home_ips="192.0.2.0/24"
interface4 eth0 home src "${home_ips}"
policy reject
server "dns ftp samba squid dhcp http ssh icmp" accept
client "samba icmp" accept
interface4 ppp+ internet src not "${home_ips} ${UNROUTABLE_IPS}"
protection strong 10/sec 10
server "smtp http ftp" accept
client all accept
router4 internet2home inface ppp+ outface eth0
masquerade reverse
client all accept
server ident reject with tcp-reset
Now we have elicited the first router, but we defined everything in the second. We have used the reverse keyword in masquerade to make it set up in inface this time.
We could use the first router (home2internet) to do everything, but then the client and server commands would need be reversed (server all, client ident) which would be confusing.